* Fix#33972
* Use consistent path resolving for links and medias.
* No need to make the markup renders to resolve the paths, instead, the
paths are all correctly resolved in the "post process" step.
* Fix#33274
* Since 1.23, all paths starting with "/" are relative to current render
context (for example: the current repo branch)
* Introduce `/:root/path-relative-to-root`, then the path will be
rendered as relative to "ROOT_URL"
The pull request list API is slow, for every pull request, it needs to
open a git repository. Assume it has 30 records, there will be 30 sub
processes back because every repository will open a git cat-file --batch
sub process. This PR use base git repository to get the head commit id
rather than read it from head repository to avoid open any head git
repository.
Follow #33127Fix#8649, fix#639
This is a complete solution. A repo unit could be set to:
* Anonymous read (non-signed-in user)
* Everyone read (signed-in user)
* Everyone write (wiki-only)
Follow #33127
This PR add backend logic and test for "anonymous access", it shares the
same logic as "everyone access", so not too much change.
By the way, split `SettingsPost` into small functions to make it easier
to make frontend-related changes in the future.
Next PR will add frontend support for "anonymous access"
1. Ignore empty inputs in `UnmarshalHandleDoubleEncode`
2. Ignore non-existing `stateEvent.User` in gitlab migration
3. Enable `release` and `wiki` units when they are selected in migration
4. Sanitize repo name for migration and new repo
Two SQLs are very slow when `action` table have over 5M records.
```
database duration=1.8881s db.sql="SELECT created_unix DIV 900 * 900 AS timestamp, count(user_id) as contributions FROM `action` WHERE user_id=? AND act_user_id=? AND (created_unix > ?) GROUP BY timestamp ORDER BY timestamp"
database duration=1.5408s db.sql="SELECT count(*) FROM `action` WHERE (user_id = ?) AND (is_deleted = ?)"
```
This will cache the count for the first loading or when the activities
changed.
When there are over 5M records on `action` table, the heatmap on
dashboard is very slow as below SQL.
```
database duration=1.8881s db.sql="SELECT created_unix DIV 900 * 900 AS timestamp, count(user_id) as contributions FROM `action` WHERE user_id=? AND act_user_id=? AND (created_unix > ?) GROUP BY timestamp ORDER BY timestamp"
```
This PR add a new index for `action` table with columns `user_id`,
`act_user_id` and `created_unix` so that this query will become about 6
times faster than before.
Resolve#29328
This pull request introduces a file tree on the left side when reviewing
files of a repository.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#33582Fix#31698
When a user login, the dashboard should load all feed belongs to him
with no any conditions. The complicated conditions should be applied
only for another user view this user's profile.
1. GetUserOrgsList should "order by" lower_name
2. GetIssuePostersWithSearch should search in-case-sensitive-ly
3. LoginName should not be used as username
By the way, remove unnecessary "onGiteaRun"
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
See the FIXME comment in code. Otherwise, if a repo's issue unit is
disabled, then the PRs can't be edited anymore.
By the way, make the permission log output look slightly better.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: metiftikci <metiftikci@hotmail.com>
Noticed a SQL in gitea.com has a bigger load. It seems both `is_pull`
and `pin_order` are not indexed columns in the database.
```SQL
SELECT `id`, `repo_id`, `index`, `poster_id`, `original_author`, `original_author_id`, `name`, `content`, `content_version`, `milestone_id`, `priority`, `is_closed`, `is_pull`, `num_comments`, `ref`, `pin_order`, `deadline_unix`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix`, `closed_unix`, `is_locked`, `time_estimate` FROM `issue` WHERE (repo_id =?) AND (is_pull = 0) AND (pin_order > 0) ORDER BY pin_order
```
I came across a comment
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24406#issuecomment-1527747296
from @delvh , which presents a more reasonable approach. Based on this,
this PR will migrate all issue and pull request pin data from the
`issue` table to the `issue_pin` table. This change benefits larger
Gitea instances by improving scalability and performance.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
